Managing and Preventing Fungicide Resistance
The use of FRAC numbers was created to help determine the mode of action of the varying fungicides. One class of fungicide may have differing active ingredients and be sold under several different trade names. For example, FRAC group 3 is sold as Bumper, Tilt, Elite, Indar, Laredo, and Quash. Regardless of the trade name or active ingredient, any one of these fungicides within a FRAC group kills the fungal pathogen the same way. In order to prevent fungicide resistant pathogens, back-to-back applications of any one FRAC group should be avoided. Figure 1: Application of a fungicide to control a foliar pathogen. The blue dot represents a resistant fungal colony to fungicide A. The formation of fungicide resistance by many pathogens is inevitable as it is basically a game of odds. Making an application of one fungicide kills the majority of the fungi in the environment that are susceptible to that particular fungicide. There are always a few colonies of the targeted fungi that “escape,” and have some degree of resistance to the chemistry (lets say odds of 1/10,000) (Figure 1). This may seem surprising, but this is due to the varying genes found within the same species of fungi (It is no different why you catch a cold, and your coworker remains healthy). Making a second application of the same chemistry provides the environment for the “escaped” population to continue to reproduce and colonize healthy tissues (Figure 2). Eventually, the “escaped” population will become the majority of the population (Figure 3), and attempts to control the pathogen by spraying the same fungicide over and over will not occur (Figure 4A). Figure 2: After fungicide A application, the resistant blue colony “escapes” and begins colonizing other healthy tissues, increasing in population. Employing resistant strategies such as fungicide rotation can delay resistance formation. By avoiding back-to-back
Recent Comments