David Doll0 commentsJune 16, 2016Irrigation, Soil

Managing Water Infiltration Problems

Over the past few weeks, there have been several farm visits discussing water infiltration issues. In many of these cases, chemical sealing of the surface soil has occurred. This creates a crust that reduces the movement of the water into the soil. In subsequent irrigation, when water is applied faster than the rate of infiltration, puddling occurs, leading to an increase in evaporation as well as saturated soil conditions. This impacts water use efficiency and tree health. A season of irrigation can require between 36 and 52 inches of applied water per acre. This is often applied to a limited area of an orchard, which is defined as the wetting pattern. Each irrigation system has a different wetting pattern, with micro-sprinklers somewhere around 30-60% of the orchard area, and drip around 20%. This means that, dependent on the system, the wetted area may receive 2-5 times more water than the targeted season’s application per acre. In other words, if  four acre feet/acre were applied using a drip system that wets around 20% of the orchard floor, the soil in that wetting profile has nearly 20 acre feet of water that must pass through in order to infiltrate the soil. This is a tremendous volume of water to pass through the soil, and it can leach away beneficial elements which leads to chemical sealing and infiltration problems. When infiltration rates slow, it is important to know the causes as not all infiltration issues are the same. Taking an analysis of the water and soil is a good place to start. Unlike soil sampling conducted in the fall, soil sampling of the top 2-3″ of soil should occur to identify the chemical imbalance.  Analyzing the soil and water will give an idea of salt load, SAR, pH, as well as other elements. This will help identify

Read More
Allan Fulton0 commentsNovember 6, 2015Soil

Understanding and Applying Information from a Soil Test, Part 4: Boron, Chloride, Copper, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, and Zinc

Allan Fulton, UC Farm Advisor, Tehama County and Roland D. Meyer, Extension Soil Specialist Emeritus This article (Part 4) discusses micronutrients and the use of soil tests to evaluate their levels in orchard soils.  Micronutrients are essential to almonds and other nut crops, yet are required in much smaller amounts than macronutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) or secondary nutrients  such as calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), or sulfur (S).  The eight micronutrients are boron (B), chloride (Cl), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn).  They fulfill important roles in the plant.  For instance, zinc is needed for plant cell expansion and it influences pollen development, flower bud differentiation, and fruit set while boron is a building block for the plant cell wall and strongly influences pollen tube germination and growth.  Flower abortion in almond and walnut has occasionally been associated with boron deficiency.  Nickel has recently been determined to be an essential nutrient and there are no known deficiencies in California. Zinc, iron and manganese deficiencies are not as commonly found in the Sacramento Valley as in the San Joaquin Valley.  Zinc deficiency is most common in almond and other nut crops.  Other micronutrient deficiencies that are occasionally seen in almond include B, Fe, and Mn.  Copper (Cu), Mo, and Ni deficiencies have not been documented in almonds; however, Cu deficiency is common in pistachios. Five of the micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn) largely exist in the soil as positively charged metal cations bound as minerals or adsorbed to the surfaces of colloids or soil particles.  Several factors in orchard soils may affect the solubility and availability of these metal cations to trees.  Soil pH greater than 7.5 has the major influence of reducing the tree availability of

Read More
Allan Fulton2 CommentsSeptember 21, 2015Soil

Understanding and Applying Information from a Soil Test, Part 3: Secondary Plant Nutrients: Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), and Sulfur (S)

Written by Allan Fulton, Farm Advisor, Tehama County and Roland D. Meyer, Extension Soils Specialist Emeritus This article (Part 3) discusses the use of soil tests to evaluate levels of the secondary nutrients calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S) in orchard soils.  It is a follow up to a series of articles on intrpretation of soil sampling results. These nutrients are considered secondary because while they are essential to crop development, seasonal crop uptake is usually lower than for the primary nutrients N, P, and K but considerably higher than the micronutrients zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), Manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), boron (B), and chloride (Cl). Calcium and Magnesium Plant uptake, cation adsorption and desorption in soil, leaching from rainfall and irrigation, and weathering of minerals all contribute to the concentration of water soluble Ca and Mg available to meet tree nutritional needs.  Water soluble cations are determined from the saturated paste extract soil test procedure while the exchangeable cations are determined with the ammonium acetate procedure.  Also important are the concentrations of exchangeable (non-water soluble) Ca and Mg which help to promote favorable soil structure.  Soil chemistry is in a constant state of change attempting to reach equilibrium between the soluble and non-soluble (exchangeable and mineral) phases.  The May 2009 newsletter discussed this dynamic process.  Calcium and magnesium share similar chemical properties in soils.  Both Ca and Mg are “double positively charged (divalent) cations in the soil-water phase and on soil cation exchange sites.  Calcium is adsorbed to soil exchange sites preferentially and more strongly than Mg.  When Ca and Mg are abundant in the soluble phase tree roots absorb these nutrients by mass flow.  If Ca and/or Mg are less abundant or limited by soil moisture, uptake occurs more slowly through diffusion. Table 1 provides ranges of exchangeable

Read More